LexBriefInsights

Whitehall at Bal Harbour v. Raviv: A Condo Association Waived Its Objection to a Partial Fee Judgment

The Third District affirmed a fee judgment against a Bal Harbour condo association that raised its timing objection only on rehearing. Lessons for fee disputes.

The empty lobby of an oceanfront condominium with a concierge desk, a wall of brass mailboxes and tall windows looking out to the ocean.
Illustration created for this article.

Attorney’s fees often become the largest number in a condominium dispute, and a January 21, 2026, decision from Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal shows how procedural choices can lock in a fee award before the rest of the case is resolved. In Whitehall at Bal Harbour Condominium Association, Inc. v. Raviv, the court affirmed a judgment awarding fees and costs to a unit owner on one count while other counts remained pending, holding that the association waived its timing objection by raising it for the first time on rehearing 1.

What happened

Unit owner Yaffa Raviv sued the Whitehall association in September 2018 and amended her complaint in April 2021, alleging negligence, seeking injunctive relief and alleging breach of contract 1. The parties entered an agreed order naming Raviv the prevailing party on the injunctive relief count, with the negligence and contract counts left for later 1. They then entered a second agreed order granting Raviv entitlement to fees and costs on that count and reserving the amount for an evidentiary hearing 1.

Raviv’s motion asked the court to enter a judgment in her favor for $214,950 in attorney’s fees and $27,909.67 in costs, plus post-judgment interest 1. The association objected only to some of the costs and to the amount of fees, not to entry of a judgment 1. The trial court held a five-hour evidentiary hearing, the parties stipulated to taxable costs, and the court entered a final judgment for fees and costs on August 30, 2024 1.

Ten days later, the association moved for rehearing and to vacate, arguing for the first time that a fee order should be entered only at the end of the case, after all counts are resolved 1. The trial court declined to consider the new argument 1.

The Third District’s reasoning

The appellate court reviewed the award for abuse of discretion and found none 1. Judge Fernandez’s opinion made three points:

  • Waiver by acquiescence. Agreeing to prevailing party status and fee entitlement is not necessarily an agreement to entry of a final fee judgment. But the association fully participated in the fee proceedings, including the five-hour hearing and negotiations over the amount, without a procedural objection, and so waived it 1.
  • No new arguments on rehearing. A trial court does not abuse its discretion by refusing to consider an argument on rehearing that could have been raised earlier, and the association knew Raviv was asking for a judgment 1.
  • Voidable, not void. Because the claimed defect was procedural, the judgment would at most have been voidable. A judgment is void only for lack of subject matter or personal jurisdiction or a denial of notice and an opportunity to be heard 1.

Why this matters at the mediation table

The decision is short, but its practical lesson is familiar to anyone who has negotiated a condominium case. Fees on a single count, here more than $214,000 requested, can exceed the value of the underlying dispute 1. Once entitlement is conceded and an amount is fixed, the leverage in the remaining counts changes.

Several takeaways for association counsel, boards and owners’ counsel:

  • Agreed orders carry weight. Stipulating to prevailing party status or entitlement can be efficient, but each stipulation should say plainly whether and when a judgment may enter.
  • Raise timing objections early. The association’s argument might have been heard if made before the evidentiary hearing 1.
  • Evaluate fees together with the merits. A global resolution can address fees on resolved counts alongside the open counts, rather than litigating them in stages.

The Legislature was also weighing how community association disputes reach court. A House staff analysis released January 22, 2026, described HB 657, which would create community association court programs in the circuit courts with authority to award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs 2. The same analysis explains that current law requires presuit mediation for many homeowners’ association disputes, and that a party who refuses to participate in mediation is barred from recovering fees and costs in later litigation on the dispute 2. Whatever the forum, fees remain a central settlement variable.

Tony Roca, a Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit Civil Mediator, mediates condominium and HOA disputes, including presuit mediation under section 720.311, Florida Statutes. Counsel and associations can check his live availability and book a mediation by Zoom statewide.

Sources

  1. Whitehall at Bal Harbour Condominium Association, Inc. v. Yaffa Raviv, No. 3D24-2031Florida Third District Court of Appeal (via CourtListener)January 21, 2026
  2. Bill Analysis, CS/HB 657 (Community Associations), Housing, Agriculture & Tourism SubcommitteeFlorida House of RepresentativesJanuary 22, 2026

General information as of January 28, 2026, not legal advice for any particular situation. How articles are sourced and updated.

Newsletter

Get the weekly brief by email

New articles and updates from LexBrief Insights, once a week. Free, no spam, unsubscribe in one click.

You will get a confirmation email first. Email is handled by Kit; see the privacy notice. General information, not legal advice.

Tony Roca

About the author

Tony Roca is an attorney licensed in Florida and Tennessee and a Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit Civil and Family Mediator with more than 4,000 mediations, conducted by Zoom across Florida. His practice is at rocalaw.com.

    ↑↓ to move, ↵ to open. Try "condo reserves", "Chapter 13" or "mediation rule".

    All sources